Chapter 8: Research a Technical Writing Problem
Kat Gray; Michael Beilfuss; Suzan Last; and Will Fleming
Introduction[1]
At some point during your college career, and likely also in your professional career, you will be asked to conduct research and then use that research to support your ideas. While this may seem intimidating, remember that engaging in research is basically just using a systematic process to find out more information about your topic. Nicholas Walliman, in his handbook Research Methods: The Basics, defines research methods as “the tools and techniques for doing research.” These techniques include collecting, sorting, and analyzing the information and data you find. The better the tools and more comprehensive the techniques you employ, the more effective your research will be. By extension, the more effective your research is, the more credible and persuasive your argument will be.
Here are some basic terms and definitions you should be familiar with:
Research: the systematic process of finding out more about something than you already know, ideally so that you can prove a hypothesis, produce new knowledge and understanding, and make evidence-based decisions.
Research Methods: techniques of collecting, sorting, and analyzing information/data.
Data: pieces of information gathered in the process of research.
Data can be categorized in several ways, detailed in the table below (Table 8.1):
Primary data Data that have been directly observed, experienced and recorded close to the event. This is data that you might create yourself by
Note: primary research done in an academic setting that includes gathering information from human subjects requires strict protocols and will likely require ethics approval. Ask your instructor for guidance and see Chapter 9: Design and Run a Pilot Study. |
Secondary Data Comes from sources that record, analyze, and interpret primary data. It is critical to evaluate the credibility of these sources. You might find such data in
|
Quantitative Data Uses numbers to describe information that can be measured quantitatively. This data is used to measure, make comparisons, examine relationships, test hypotheses, explain, predict, or even control. |
Qualitative Data Uses words to record and describe the data collected; often describes people’s feelings, judgments, emotions, customs, and beliefs that can only be expressed in descriptive words, not in numbers. This includes “anecdotal data” or personal experiences. |
Table 8.1: Types of research data.
In other words, you may encounter a wide variety of data during research for a technical writing project. You will likely need to combine (or synthesize) your understanding of academic and trade publications, quantitative data you have collected, and information about stakeholder needs, goals, and constraints. You’ll need to think about how to do this in a way that combines accountable information gathering with honest and above-board information sharing.
For a brief overview of this process, please watch the video below, “Research in Technical Writing,” by William Smith:
Technical Writing Research Methods[2]
Research is not just collecting facts for a technical writing document; it is a process in which information is uncovered and expressed in meaningful ways to the audience. Before you begin creating any documents, you need to gather all the required information. In technical writing, you will use a variety of different research methods to do this work.
Primary Research
Primary research comes from studies you conduct and from published records and documents. Primary research methods allow you to gather first-hand information from data, users, stakeholders, and subject matter experts (SMEs). This information helps technical writers understand the problems they hope to solve and the solutions they might implement in greater depth.
Examples: lab experiments, product testing, surveys, observations, measurements, interviews, site visits, prototype testing, beta testing library databases, print media, websites, published raw statistical data, historical records, legal documents, firsthand historical accounts, discussions with subject matter experts (SMEs) like engineers, developers, or project managers.
Secondary Research
Secondary research comes from studies that others (usually researchers, academics, or SMEs) conduct. Secondary research provides the backing of professional researchers who are researching similar problems to your own. This information helps technical writers broaden their understanding of the problems and solutions they are researching. For example, seeing how a traffic congestion problem was solved in a city of a similar size to Fayetteville might help you understand how to write about the likely results of such a project here in town.
Examples: research papers, studies, white papers, reviews, analyses, critiques.
Tertiary Research
Finally, tertiary research involves using general information sources – such sources consolidate primary and secondary information into compressed, brief formats. They are, in other words, often summaries of the knowledge on a topic. They help technical writers to corroborate facts and to gain a general understanding of both your topic and major concepts, lines of inquiry, or schools of thought in a particular field (like architecture, engineering, or chemistry).
Examples: dictionaries, encyclopedias, handbooks, bibliographies.
Research Tips
As you prepare to research any writing project, keep these takeaways in mind:
- Primary research is research you conduct. How you choose to conduct it depends on what types of questions you need to answer.
- Secondary research is research others have conducted. Typically, you read secondary research before you do primary research to get an idea of what is already happening in your professional field or academic discipline.
- Tertiary research helps you to confirm facts and get a quick overview of a topic.
- Strong research projects thoughtfully blend primary, secondary, and tertiary research.
Using Reliable Sources
Whether you are writing for class, colleagues within a workplace, or outside vendors, customers, or stakeholders, you will want to utilize your writing as an opportunity to build a positive, ethical reputation with your audience. Your goal is to maintain and enhance your credibility, and that of your organization, at all times.
Credibility can be established through many means: citing respected sources, providing reliable evidence, using sound logic, and writing with clear, concise language. Make sure as you start your research that you always question the credibility of the sources you find. You should know the answers to the following questions:
- Are the sources popular or scholarly?
- Are they peer reviewed by experts in the field?
- Can the information be verified by other sources?
- Are the methods and arguments based on solid reasoning and sound evidence?
- Is the author identifiable and do they have appropriate credentials?
You can also learn more about evaluating sources in the “Note-Taking for Research Projects” section, below.
Be cautious about using sources that are not reviewed by peers or editors, or in which the information cannot be verified, or seems misleading, biased, or even false. Be a wise information consumer in your own reading and research in order to build your reputation as an honest, ethical writer.
Quoting the work of others in your writing is fine, provided that you credit the source fully enough that your readers can find it on their own. If you fail to take careful notes, or the sentence is present in your writing but later fails to get accurate attribution, it can have a negative impact on you and your organization. That is why it is important that when you find an element you would like to incorporate in your document, in the same moment as you copy and paste or make a note of it in your research file you need to note the source in a complete enough form to find it again.
Giving credit where credit is due will build your credibility and enhance your document. Moreover, when your writing is authentically yours, your audience will catch your enthusiasm, and you will feel more confident in the material you produce. Just as you have a responsibility in business to be honest in selling your product or service and avoid cheating your customers, so you have a responsibility in professional writing to be honest in presenting your ideas, and the ideas of others, and to avoid cheating your readers with plagiarized material.
Information Literacy and the Research Process[3]
Regardless of the type of information you need for a technical writing project, you will need a careful plan (a research process) to help you gather information before you begin writing a document. In this section, you will learn about the concept of information literacy – a particular framework for thinking about the information we gather – as a precursor to understanding how to think about the research process. Further, you will learn practical tips that will help you practice your information literacy skills when you do research, no matter why you need the information.
What is Information Literacy?
Information literacy can be defined as a critical perspective, point of view, or framework that guides how people consume, evaluate, produce, use, and archive information. In fact, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization wrote that “[i]nformation literacy empowers people in all walks of life to seek, evaluate, use and create information effectively to achieve their personal, social, occupational and educational goals” (“Information Literacy,” 2023). It is a cluster of core, interconnected competencies people possess to identify, find, evaluate, apply, and acknowledge information.
For more information on what it means to be information literate, watch the video “The Five Components of Information Literacy” from Seminole State Library:
Why Is Information Literacy Important?
Through information literacy, we learn to recognize that not all information is created equal. For instance, content on the internet is easy to access, and there’s a lot of it – but it doesn’t always come from credible sources, as anyone can publish content for others to access. This means that there is a lot of bad or useless information to sort through when performing research. In an age of misinformation and disinformation, it’s not always easy to determine which are credible sources and which are not, which makes becoming an information literate researcher all the more crucial. Information literacy helps us to recognize misleading, out-of-date, or false information. It also helps us sort through the data and interpret it intelligently.
Being information literate means we’re able to:
- Recognize problems and create questions
- Make a plan for finding information and solutions
- Formulate hypotheses and make predictions
- Find information and data from libraries and the Internet
- Evaluate the credibility of the sources (i.e. is the material peer-reviewed or held to an ethical standard?)
- Organize and synthesize all gathered information
- Make conclusions and process understanding
Developing your information literacy skills pays off. You won’t just use these skills in a college classroom – you might use information literacy skills to help you make a decision about which car to buy, to decide how to vote in your next local election, or to inform your decision to evacuate (or not) in front of an incoming hurricane. There are many times in our lives, in fact, when we need to use information literacy skills to make the best decision possible for our situations. Further, if the goal of an ethical technical writer is to honestly and clearly communicate information to an audience, that commitment must begin with finding the best information you can to support the content you create.
Using Information Literacy for Research
Implementing information literacy practices in your research process takes careful planning before you start. In particular, you will want to go into a research session with a clear list of questions to answer. The questions you ask are likely to change depending on where you are in the research process. Earlier in the process, it’s important to confirm and extend your understanding of your topic, while in the later parts of the research process, you will probably be looking for information that helps you to refine the details of your document. It’s also important to plan for effective research sessions before you begin your search. You will want to create a list of keywords to use in your searches, and you will also want to have a good understanding of what kinds of sources you need, which will subsequently affect where you look for information.
Have Clear Research Questions
By the time you are ready to start working on your problem primer, you should have a basic understanding of what problem you are investigating, who is affected by the problem, and why it is important to find a solution. To do that, you need to create a list of research questions you need to answer. You might ask research questions that help you…
- Understand the problem
- Understand stakeholders
- Investigate causes
- Investigate solutions
- Evaluate solutions
- Understand the audience, purpose, and context for the document
Plan for Effective Research Sessions
Once you develop a list of research questions, you’re almost ready to start searching for information. Before you can do that, however, you will want to create a plan. Planning your research sessions helps you to work more effectively. Having a clear list of questions is a part of that plan. However, you will also need to think about how to create keywords, what types of sources you’ll need, and where to look for them.
Effective research sessions necessitate that you…
- Know your goals: Why are you undertaking this project? Why are you creating this document? The answers to these questions will help you center your research process on finding the information you need.
- Double-check information: Even if you are certain you know a fact, double-checking your information for accuracy lets you catch problems or mistakes before the document goes out to your audience.
- Verify information using multiple sources: Whenever possible, verify your information is correct by cross-checking it using multiple sources. If you find the same estimated percentage of food insecurity in NWA in three different sources, odds are, that number is probably correct.
- Talk with experts in the field: Another option for verifying your information, talking with experts in the field can help you to ensure that the information you are communicating with your audience is both accurate and precise.
Keyword Searches
Once you know the questions you need to answer, you will need to determine keywords that you can use to search different resources. That is, instead of putting your research questions directly into the search bar, you need to develop short phrases that represent the most important themes represented in your questions. For example, if you wanted to research how much it would cost to build a community garden in the common area of your apartment complex, you might try search terms like community garden, community garden program, sustainable gardening, and community garden planning.
Developing keywords by looking through your research questions. You should be able to pick out the most important words and phrases from those questions; then, you can attempt to use those phrases to find more information that will help you build your project. It is important to have a wide range of keywords because not all search terms will return the same information. You might also use a keyword search to find out what terms other people use to talk about the topic or to learn about related terms and concepts.
You should have a basic understanding of how you can use Boolean operators, which allow you to combine keywords or exclude information from searches. These words refine your search results to be more relevant to your needs. Below (Table 8.2), you can find a brief explanation of how these terms work, based on this resource from the University of Minnesota.
Operator | How It Works | Example |
AND | Using AND combines keywords. All search results must contain both terms. The more concepts you link with AND, the fewer results you will receive. | Aspirin AND Children AND Reye’s Syndrome |
OR | Using OR broadens results to include synonyms. Retrieves results in which either or both terms appear. The more concepts you link with OR, the more results you will receive. | Kidney disease OR Renal disease |
NOT | Using NOT excludes concepts not relevant to your search. Using NOT reduces the number of search results you receive. | Dementia NOT Alzheimer’s |
“…” | Using quotation marks around a search term narrows your results to contain only those words, in that specific order and with no other words between them. Putting a search term in quotation marks reduces the number of search results you receive. | “food desert” |
Table 8.2: Boolean operators for research.
For more specific help searching for and evaluating sources and deciding which types of sources are best suited for your project, consult with your instructor.
Note-Taking for Research Projects[4]
Research in technical writing involves finding information that will help you create a correct, clear, ethical document that accomplishes both your goals and the audience’s goals. Research for such projects takes a lot of time, and researchers can’t memorize all the information they find – that’s why it’s important to have some idea of how to take notes on your sources. To further complicate this process, as the section on information literacy above suggests, you must also make space in your notes to evaluate your sources. The information below will help you ensure that you work with your sources in a way that promotes deep understanding of both the problem you are investigating and the work you are producing.
Basic Source Information
To begin with, make sure that you document all the information that you will need to correctly cite each source you find. Having this information in your notes will not only help you to cite ethically – you will also be able to find the source again if you need to access it a second time. This includes:
- Title
- Author’s name
- Publication date
- Associated organizations (publishing house, website, university, etc.)
- Type of media (journal article, book, newspaper, video, social media post, etc.)
- Digital location (if you accessed your source digitally, save either the web URL or the Digital Object Identifier [DOI] number)
Next, you will want to take notes that help you remember the contents of each source. You’ll also want to jot down any ideas you have about how you might use this source in your current project. Consider adding the following elements to your research notes:
- A brief source summary so you can easily remember a source’s contents when you need to reference your notes later.
- Memorable quotes you may want to use in your own project. Remember to always put quotes around other people’s words in your notes. This will help you to make sure you don’t accidentally present their words as your own.
- Further questions you have about either the source itself or the topic after you have read and understood the source.
- Connections between this source and the other sources you’ve investigated. What ideas link these sources together? How do the sources differ?
Evaluating Sources
Once you comprehend a source’s message, you can evaluate that source. When you evaluate sources, you are looking for credible sources that can provide reliable and useful data to support your ideas. Using credible sources also improves your relationship with your readers, who will feel more confident in your findings if they know you did your due diligence.
Scholarly articles published in academic journals are usually required sources in academic research essays; they are also an integral part of engineering projects and technical reports. Many projects require a literature review, which collects, summarizes and sometimes evaluates the work of researchers in this field whose work has been recognized as a valuable contribution to the “state of the art.” However, they are not the only kind of research you will find useful. Since you are researching in a professional field and preparing for the workplace, there are many credible kinds of sources you will draw on in a professional context. Table 8.3 lists several types of sources you may find useful in researching your projects.
Source Type | Description |
---|---|
Academic Journals, Conference Papers, Dissertations, etc. |
Scholarly (peer-reviewed) academic sources publish primary research done by professional researchers and scholars in specialized fields, as well as reviews of that research by other specialists in the same field. For example, the Journal of Computer and System Sciences publishes original research papers in computer science and related subjects in system science; International Journal of Robotics and Animation is one of the most highly ranked journals in the field. |
Reference Works |
Specialized encyclopedias, handbooks and dictionaries can provide useful terminology and background information. For example, the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology is a widely recognized authoritative source. Do not cite Wikipedia or dictionary.com in a technical report. |
Books
Chapters in Books |
Books written by specialists in a given field and contain a References section can be very helpful in providing in-depth context for your ideas. For example, Designing Engineers by Susan McCahan et al. has an excellent chapter on effective teamwork |
Trade Magazines and Popular Science Magazines |
Reputable trade magazines contain articles relating to current issues and innovations, and therefore they can be very useful in determining the “state of the art” or what is “cutting edge” at the moment, or finding out what current issues or controversies are affecting the industry. Examples include Computerworld, Wired, and Popular Mechanics. |
Newspapers (Journalism) |
Newspaper articles and media releases can offer a sense of what journalists and people in industry think the general public should know about a given topic. Journalists report on current events and recent innovations; more in-depth “investigative journalism” explores a current issue in greater detail. Newspapers also contain editorial sections that provide personal opinions on these events and issues. You should be aware of the ideological leanings of journalistic sources; for help determining this information, you can use the Media Bias Chart at this link. |
Industry Websites (.com) |
Commercial websites are generally intended to “sell,” so you have to select information carefully, but these websites can give you insights into a company’s “mission statement,” organization, strategic plan, current or planned projects, archived information, White Papers, technical reports, product details, costs estimates, etc. |
Organization Websites (.org) |
A vast array of .org sites can be very helpful in supplying data and information. These are often public service sites and are designed to share information with the public. |
Government Publications and Public Sector Web Sites (.gov/.edu) |
Government departments often publish reports and other documents that can be very helpful in determining public policy, regulations, and guidelines that should be followed. University web sites also offer a wide array of non-academic information, such as strategic plans, facilities information, etc. |
Patents |
You may have to distinguish your innovative idea from previously patented ideas; you can look these up and get detailed information on patented or patent-pending ideas. |
Public Presentations |
Public Consultation meetings and representatives from industry and government speak to various audiences about current issues and proposed projects. These can be live presentations or video presentations available on YouTube or TED talks. |
Other |
Can you think of some more? (Radio programs, Podcasts, Social Media, etc.) |
The importance of critically evaluating your sources for authority, relevance, timeliness, and credibility cannot be overstated. Anyone can put anything on the internet; and people with strong web and document design skills can make this information look very professional and credible—even if it isn’t. Since much research is currently done online, and many sources are available electronically, developing your information literacy skills is crucial to finding valid, credible evidence to support and develop your ideas. In fact, this has become such a challenging issue that there are sites like Beall’s List of Predatory Journals that regularly update its online list of journals that subvert the peer review process and simply publish for profit.
When evaluating research sources and presenting your own research, be careful to critically evaluate the authority, content, and purpose of the material, using questions in Table 8.4.
Authority
Researchers, Authors, and Creators |
Who are the researchers/authors/creators? Who is their intended audience? What are their credentials/qualifications? What else has this author written? Is this research funded? By whom? Who benefits? Who has intellectual ownership of this idea? How do I cite it? Where is this source published? What kind of publication is it? Authoritative Sources: written by experts for a specialized audience, published in peer-reviewed journals or by respected publishers, and containing well-supported, evidence-based arguments. Popular Sources: written for a general (or possibly niche) public audience, often in an informal or journalistic style , published in newspapers, magazines, and websites with a purpose of entertaining or promoting a product; evidence is often “soft” rather than hard. |
---|---|
Content Methodology and Data |
Methodology What is the methodology of their study? Or how has evidence been collected? Is the methodology sound? Can you find obvious flaws? What is its scope? Does it apply to your project? How? How recent and relevant is it? What is the publication date or last update? |
Data Is there sufficient data here to support their claims or hypotheses? Do they offer quantitative and/or qualitative data? Are visual representations of the data misleading or distorted in some way? |
|
Purpose |
Why has this author presented this information to this audience? Why am I using this source? Will using this source bolster my credibility or undermine it? Am I cherry picking – the use of inadequate or unrepresentative data that only supports my position (and ignores substantial amount of data that contradicts it)? Could cognitive bias be at work here? Have I only consulted the kinds of sources I know will support my idea? Have I failed to consider alternative kinds of sources? Am I representing the data I have collected accurately? Are the data statistically relevant or significant? |
We all have biases when we write or argue; however, when evaluating sources, you want to be on the look out for bias that is unfair, one-sided, or slanted. Consider whether the author has acknowledged and addressed opposing ideas, potential gaps in the research, or limitations of the data. Look at the kind of language the author uses: is it slanted, strongly connotative, or emotionally manipulative? Is the supporting evidence presented logically, credibly, and ethically? Has the author cherry-picked or misrepresented sources or ideas? Does the author rely heavily on emotional appeal?
Critical thinking lies at the heart of evaluating sources. It is important to use data ethically and accurately, and to apply logic correctly and validly to support your ideas. You want to be rigorous in your selection of evidence, because once you use it in your paper, it will either bolster your own credibility or undermine it.
Creating a Project Pitch
A pitch is a short speech (75-100 words) typically delivered in around 30-60 seconds. Jennifer Herrity (2015) explained the genre as a “concise introduction” to both yourself and something you are trying to promote – a project or a relationship (a collaboration or mentorship, for example).
Pitches are a common technical writing genre. You may have also heard the term elevator pitch, which helps to explain how such genres are meant to be used: to introduce yourself to someone you don’t know but are hoping to network with. Though a pitch is short and may be used in a relatively casual setting (like an elevator ride, or introducing yourself to someone at a conference), the genre still takes thought and practice.
A good pitch will accomplish two key goals. First, a pitch seeks to make a good impression on the listener. Second, a pitch makes clear your strengths and values as a professional. The pitch should give your audience a good idea of who you are, what matters to you, and why it’s worth it for the audience to develop or continue a relationship with you.
You are being asked to create an individual project pitch for project 3. This assignment should:
- Identify a research method for your pilot study
- Clearly state your research questions
- Cite one local media source
Four Steps to Create a Pitch[5]
Since pitches are a compact genre, it’s important to be clear and concise. This means you will want to carefully compose your pitch to communicate information in words that are both accurate and interesting. The four steps below, derived from Indeed.com’s “How to Craft and Deliver an Effective Elevator Pitch” can serve as a guide for your work.
- Introduce yourself. Make sure to give your name and organizational affiliation, if you have one. Follow with a polite greeting like “It’s nice to meet you.”
- Summarize what you do. What is your specialty, educational background, or field? Tailor this information towards which parts of your professional background are most relevant to your audience.
- Explain what you want. Why did you start this conversation? Clarify your goals, whether that is to seek a job opportunity, collaboration, mentorship, or to give a project overview. Emphasize your professional values.
- Finish with a call to action. What are the next steps? You might ask for a call or meeting with your audience, or exchange contact information.
Example: Project 3 Pitch
Project 3 asks you to create a pitch about a problem you want to examine for the Problem Primer and Collaborative Grant Proposal. Here’s a brief example of how that might look.
- Introduce: Hi, I’m Cody, and I’m a junior here. It’s nice to talk with you all today!
- Summarize: I’m getting a degree in Computer Engineering, and I’m most interested in cybersecurity.
- Explain: I want to work on a project that looks at cybersecurity issues at the city level in Fayetteville.
- Call to Action: This could be a really important project because residents need to log in to the website to pay their water and sewer bills, and last month, a cybersecurity incident happened that meant about 50% of users had their payment information exposed. I want to understand why that happened and how we can make the city’s systems more secure. I want to do interviews with both city workers and customers to understand what happened and suggest some possible solutions.
As you prepare to deliver your pitch, remember that you will need to practice. In a professional situation, you’ll want to be able to deliver the pitch without notes, which you can only do by practicing. Practice also helps you to understand whether your wording is going to work – sometimes trying to read our words aloud calls our attention to revisions that help us communicate more clearly. Further, you should always think about tailoring your pitch towards your audience. What information will help your audience not only to understand your message but also to want to follow up on your proposal?
Conclusion
[content]
References
Beall’s list of potential predatory journals and publishers. (2024). Retrieved 15 July 2025, from http://beallslist.net.
“Boolean Operators: A Cheat Sheet.” (2024). University of Minnesota Libraries. Retrieved 3 July 2025, from https://libguides.umn.edu/BooleanOperators.
Engineering Communication Program. (n.d.). Literature reviews. University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. Retrieved 15 July 2025, from https://ecp.engineering.utoronto.ca/resources/online-handbook/components-of-documents/literature-reviews/.
Herrity, Jennifer. (2025, March 21, updated). How to craft and deliver an effective elevator pitch (with examples). Indeed. Retrieved 15 July 2025, from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/interviewing/how-to-give-an-elevator-pitch-examples.
Seminole State Library. (2014, Jan. 29). “5 Components of Information Literacy.” YouTube. Retrieved 30 June 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ronp6Iue9w.
Smith, William. (2020). “Research in Technical Writing.” YouTube. Retrieved 30 June 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5WJQzeDpjc.
UMA Writing Center. (2016, Oct. 16). “Writing is a Recursive Process.” YouTube. Retrieved 30 June 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n94KtBoWaU0&t=2s.
UNESCO. (2023). “Information Literacy.” Retrieved 30 June 2025, from https://www.unesco.org/en/ifap/information-literacy.
Walliman, Nicholas. (2011). Research Methods: The Basics. Routledge: New York.
- Adapted from Will Fleming's "Chapter 6: Research and Information Literacy," in Technical Writing at LBCC and Suzan Last's Chapter 5: Conducting Research from Technical Writing Essentials. ↵
- Based on Suzan Last's Chapter 5: Conducting Research from Technical Writing Essentials and Michael Beilfuss' Chapter 4: Ethics from Technical and Professional Writing Genres: A Study in Theory and Practice ↵
- Adapted from Will Fleming's "Chapter 6: Research and Information Literacy" in Technical Writing at LBCC. ↵
- Based on Suzan Last's "Finding and Evaluating Research Sources," from Technical Writing Essentials. ↵
- Steps derived from Indeed.com's "How to Craft and Deliver an Effective Elevator Pitch (with Examples)" (https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/interviewing/how-to-give-an-elevator-pitch-examples). ↵