19 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) Workforce Pilot Survey

The “SOGI Workforce Pilot Survey” report summarizes the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) efforts to collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) from full-time federal employees and Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) assignees. The survey was conducted between March 28 and April 18, 2024, and assessed respondents’ attitudes towards SOGI questions, their willingness to answer them in federal surveys, and their preferences for how such questions should be asked. The survey was part of a broader initiative under Executive Order 14075 to promote LGBTQI+ equity in the federal government and promote more inclusive data practices.

Key findings from the survey include:

• Demographics and Response Rate: The survey had a 26% response rate, with 504 respondents. Among them, 18% identified as LGBTQI+, with 3% as gender minorities and 17% as sexual minorities.
• Clarity and Preferences: Most respondents found the SOGI questions clear. However, some expressed confusion or objection to certain terms like “non-binary” and “transgender.” Preferences for how to ask about gender varied, with some favoring traditional categories (male/female) and others supporting gender identity terms (woman/man).
• Willingness to Disclose Information: A significant portion of respondents were hesitant to disclose SOGI data without more information on its use. Trust in data handling was a major concern, particularly regarding sexual orientation information.
• Attitudes and Feedback: Respondents showed mixed reactions to the survey, with some appreciating the effort to collect SOGI data while others protested the inclusion of such questions, viewing them as intrusive or agenda driven.
• Recommendations: The report suggests broadening gender and sexual orientation categories, enhancing communication about the purpose and benefits of SOGI data collection, and addressing trust issues by clearly explaining how the data will be used.

Additionally, and more specifically, collecting sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data is crucial for several reasons within the federal government and academia. Given this, here are some specific areas of opportunity that we hope this work can inform:

• Federal Government

• • Policy Development and Implementation: It is our hope that this work enables the creation of policies and programs that address the specific needs of LGBTQ+ populations. With the goal of crafting targeted initiatives to promote equality and combat discrimination.
  • Resource Allocation: Understanding the demographics of LGBTQ+ communities allows for more efficient allocation of resources, ensuring that services and support are directed to areas where they are most needed.
  • Monitoring and Compliance: Collecting SOGI data helps in monitoring the effectiveness of anti-discrimination laws and policies. It also aids in ensuring compliance with federal regulations that protect LGBTQ+ rights.
  • Public Health: SOGI data is vital for public health research and interventions. It helps in identifying health disparities, tailoring public health campaigns, and improving healthcare access and outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals.
  • Civil Rights Enforcement: Accurate data on sexual orientation and gender identity supports the enforcement of civil rights protections, helping to identify and address disparities and discrimination.

• Academia

• • Research and Scholarship: SOGI data is essential for conducting comprehensive research on LGBTQ+ issues. It facilitates studies on health, social outcomes, economic status, and other areas, contributing to a deeper understanding of these communities.
  • Educational Equity: In academic settings, SOGI data helps identify and address inequalities and barriers faced by LGBTQ+ students and staff. This information can lead to the development of inclusive policies and practices.
  • Curriculum Development: Insights from SOGI data can inform the creation of curricula that are inclusive and reflective of diverse experiences, promoting a more inclusive educational environment.
  • Campus Climate: Collecting SOGI data helps in assessing the campus climate for LGBTQ+ individuals, guiding efforts to create safer and more supportive academic environments.
  • Representation and Visibility: Ensuring that LGBTQ+ individuals are represented in data collection underscores their visibility and importance within academic research and discourse, promoting a culture of inclusivity.

Overall, the systematic collection and analysis of SOGI data are pivotal for promoting equity, inclusion, and the well-being of LGBTQ+ populations in both governmental and academic contexts. The report concludes that while there are significant challenges and mixed reactions, collecting SOGI data is essential for promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) within the federal workforce. The findings will help refine best practices and inform government-wide guidance on SOGI data collection.