Regionalization of Textile Production in Response to Geopolitical Shifts

Introduction

For decades the global textile and apparel industry has used cost-driven supply chains that span across the globe. Production strategies have prioritized manufacturing in regions that have low-cost labor and materials. This model enabled the fashion industry to grow rapidly and played a big role in the rise of fast fashion, while also creating deeply intertwined and delicate supply networks. In recent years, there has been an increase of geopolitical disruptions that have revealed the limitations of this system. The global crises and rising political tensions have brought trade regulations and tariffs that no longer allow companies to operate as they once did without major risk. These unreliable circumstances mean cost efficiency cannot be the sole priority. Brands are being forced to structure their sourcing and production strategies differently if they want to thrive. Within the next few years it is likely we will see a very large uprise of regionalization of the textile industry due to tariffs, trade conflicts, and global crises.

Background

The landscape for global trade and economic geography is shifting. Before, brands would search for producers that could provide the lowest cost possible for the desired quality, which often included utilizing different countries for different parts of the production process. Production decisions in the current geopolitical climate are becoming more heavily influenced by political dynamics, utilizing online marketplaces and risk management considerations. Firms are turning to nearshoring and regional sourcing tactics to decrease disruptions during the production process (Chen & Han, 2025).

The delays, cancellations, and other major disruptions of global production have caused many issues in recent years, and brands that value reliability must make the switch to regional production to protect their reputation. Alongside this issue, brands are struggling to overcome the hurdles global trade policies have been creating. For instance, the apparel industry has a strong reliance on China for the production of textiles as well as labor. These reliances are becoming weaker as political tensions between the United States and China get increasingly worse. Many sourcing managers are moving away from China because it is too much of a risk in the current climate (Maile & Staritz, 2026). Businesses have turned to diversifying suppliers in an attempt to reduce reliance on a single country and strengthen brand security. Utilizing tactics such as offshoring, nearshoring, and onshoring help keep the production process smooth. New trade laws are frequently enacted, and the risk of losing your only supplier country to tariffs or blockades has become too high (Butollo et al., 2025). Because of the pressure of rapid trend cycles in the industry, many brands are unwilling to take the risk of longer lead times. The rise in e-commerce has increased the expectation of product releases from consumers, which in turn has increased demand for quick production cycles and flexible distribution. As all of these factors compound, it forces brands to reshape how they have historically approached sourcing so they do not get left behind. Complying with this mass shift in industry trends has become necessary to not lose one’s footing in the market.

Trend Analysis

Current trend analysis shows a shift in global value chains turning to more transparent and regional processes. This is attributed to various factors, including increased pressure to produce more sustainably and geopolitical changes. Companies are changing their trajectories to better fit the mold of new regulations (Rybakovas & Sekliuckiene, 2023). This shift marks the transition from a single, low-cost-driven sourcing approach to strategies based on sustainability, resilience, and efficiency. Although this is an apparent shift, it is not a complete disregard of cost, but rather a broader picture approach. Cost is still a factor; however, it is no longer the sole factor. In a study on the regionalization of global value chains (GVC) after the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers found that both H&M and Adidas shifted towards regionalization as a response to pandemic-induced disruptions. The firms showed a prominent reduction in global suppliers and an increase in regional suppliers. This supports their hypothesis that firms are shortening supply chains in response to GVC disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This resilience functions as a form of risk management, allowing companies to recover more quickly and effectively from disruptions. Looking at aspects ahead of time, including diverse supplier chains, repetitive business behaviors, and sourcing from politically stable regions, are all forms of risk management. Sustainability is no longer an option, it is a necessity. Increasing environmental regulations and ethical labor laws require brands to meet these expectations, and it can be detrimental if they don’t. This means there are other considerations beyond finances. This shift changes the entire blueprint of sourcing strategies, moving from a reactive stance to a proactive planning approach.

Implications for Sourcing Professionals

This shift not only changes companies and their sourcing patterns, but also alters how sourcing professionals make decisions. The shift to more regionalized sourcing has increased the responsibilities for supply chain managers. In particular, in how they evaluate and engage with new sourcing markets. Geopolitics are reshaping production as a whole, and countries such as India are offering themselves as a strategic alternative within the textile chain. India’s entrepreneurial growth and evolving policies are allowing for a greater integration of global markets. Especially as the desire to diversify and get away from centralized production hot spots increases. This shift requires sourcing professionals to develop deeper knowledge of regional policy frameworks, infrastructure capabilities, and supplier ecosystems in these new markets. The increasing importance of countries like India highlights the need for proactive, strategic sourcing approaches that take into consideration both geopolitical risks and growing opportunities. Sourcing professionals are responsible for managing disruptions, as well as identifying and developing adequate sourcing regions that fit their new approach.

Conclusion

Geopolitical disruptions such as tariffs, trade conflicts, and global crises have heavily impacted the sourcing and production strategies used within the apparel industry. Many companies risk losing their main or only manufacturer due to these geopolitical disruptions.  Brands are now focused on diversifying suppliers to navigate sustainability, efficiency, and maintaining their low costs. This shift is necessary for a brand to survive. Within the next 3 to 10 years, we will see many companies begin to regionalize sourcing and production. It is crucial to adapt to challenges as they appear while the fashion industry grows in a constantly changing geopolitical climate. Overall, regionalization is becoming increasingly popular. This being said, globalization is still a key part of the textile production supply chain,  and the textile industry is transforming into a more flexible and regionalized system.

References

BoF Insights, & McKinsey & Company. (2024, November 18). How fashion is shaking up its global sourcing strategies. The Business of Fashion. https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-markets/the-state-of-fashion-2025-report-global-sourcing-manufacturing-supply-chain/

Butollo, F., Staritz, C., Maile, F., & Wuttke, T. (2025). The end of globalized production? Supply-chain resilience, technological sovereignty, and enduring global interdependencies in the post-pandemic era. Critical Sociology, 51(4–5), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241239872

Chen, Q., & Han, Y. (2025). The theoretical evolution and practical resonance of trade geography: Frontier issues in the context of global pattern restructuring. Geographical Research Bulletin, 4, 335–338. https://doi.org/10.50908/grb.4.0_335

Global textile supply chains: Geopolitical challenges and outlook. (2025). Market Prospects. https://www.market-prospects.com/articles/textile-supply-chain-geopolitical-impact

Maile, F., & Staritz, C. (2026). Lead firm strategies in the global textile and apparel industry: Are disruptions reconfiguring the geographies of production? Journal of Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbag016

Ramesh, S., Schimmel, K., Slack, F., & Jeananne, N. (2025). India’s entrepreneurial awakening: Navigating geopolitical shifts and domestic policy reforms. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040122

Rybakovas, E., & Sekliuckiene, J. (2023). Transformation of business models in the global textile, apparel, and fashion industry, facing the sustainability and global value chains reconfiguration pressures. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship (ICTE) (pp. 68–73). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTE58739.2023.10488560

Sekliuckiene, J., & Rybakovas, E. (2023). The Quest for Regionalization of Global Value Chains in a Pandemic Global Business Environment. Inžinerinė Ekonomika, 34(2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.34.2.31640

The Interline. (2025, March 6). The supply chain: Fashion’s big strategic focus for 2025. https://www.theinterline.com/2025/03/06/the-supply-chain-fashions-big-strategic-focus-for-2025/